Comments on: Tension in early-Wittgenstein’s critique of set theory http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/tension-in-early-wittgensteins-critique-of-set-theory/ Later Wittgenstein's philosophical developments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:31:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: John Ryskamp http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/tension-in-early-wittgensteins-critique-of-set-theory/#comment-618 John Ryskamp Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:05:17 +0000 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/tension-in-early-wittgensteins-critique-of-set-theory/#comment-618 You should read Garciadiego's book on Russell and the set-theoretic paradoxes. You don't understand the issues--neither did Wittgenstein. Ryskamp, John Henry, "Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth-Century Ideas" (May 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897085 You should read Garciadiego’s book on Russell and the set-theoretic paradoxes. You don’t understand the issues–neither did Wittgenstein.

Ryskamp, John Henry, “Paradox, Natural Mathematics, Relativity and Twentieth-Century Ideas” (May 19, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=897085

]]>