Comments on: Nice tutorial on Wittgenstein’s conception of grammar http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/nice-tutorial-on-wittgensteins-conception-of-grammar/ Later Wittgenstein's philosophical developments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:31:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Thomas Young http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/nice-tutorial-on-wittgensteins-conception-of-grammar/#comment-962 Thomas Young Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:12:29 +0000 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-962 The Angelo site is thought-provoking, informative and well written. The Angelo site is thought-provoking, informative and well written.

]]> By: Cherry http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/nice-tutorial-on-wittgensteins-conception-of-grammar/#comment-922 Cherry Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:43:11 +0000 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-922 Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit. cheers, Cherry. Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Cherry.

]]> By: dprice218 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/nice-tutorial-on-wittgensteins-conception-of-grammar/#comment-903 dprice218 Tue, 06 May 2008 18:00:39 +0000 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-903 That's great, thanks a lot for that link. I was always disappointed with the fact that my thesis lacked a sufficient inclusion of Husserl's intentionality. It only later occurred to me, AFTER the oral defense of the thesis, that failure to do so was fairly epic. I do hope they post the paper, I'd be very interested to see it. The only paper I recall reading that explicitly dealt with Husserl and Wittgenstein re: intentionality was something called "Wittgenstein and the Snark" and then something about social naturalism. I have the paper but do not currently have access to it as I'm away from my desktop. That’s great, thanks a lot for that link. I was always disappointed with the fact that my thesis lacked a sufficient inclusion of Husserl’s intentionality. It only later occurred to me, AFTER the oral defense of the thesis, that failure to do so was fairly epic.

I do hope they post the paper, I’d be very interested to see it. The only paper I recall reading that explicitly dealt with Husserl and Wittgenstein re: intentionality was something called “Wittgenstein and the Snark” and then something about social naturalism. I have the paper but do not currently have access to it as I’m away from my desktop.

]]> By: N. N. http://dprice218.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/nice-tutorial-on-wittgensteins-conception-of-grammar/#comment-902 N. N. Mon, 05 May 2008 13:19:18 +0000 http://dprice218.wordpress.com/?p=95#comment-902 David, Good to see you're back. On Friday there was a talk given at the Wittgenstein Workshop comparing Wittgenstein and Husserl on intention and fulfillment. The paper wasn't posted, but there are plans to post the audio soon. The Workshop's address is: http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/wittgenstein/ David,

Good to see you’re back.

On Friday there was a talk given at the Wittgenstein Workshop comparing Wittgenstein and Husserl on intention and fulfillment. The paper wasn’t posted, but there are plans to post the audio soon. The Workshop’s address is: http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/wittgenstein/

]]>